jack sewing machine dealers in chennai, perambur, mylapore, madipakkam - VS SewingMachine
The spark and crackle typically
associated with new consumer electronics were subdued during 1975.
Though the spotlight played briefly on video disks, little hardware is
yet available — excitement dissipated quickly, awaiting the “big push”
still scheduled for late this year when MCA/Philips and RCA start
marketing players in the United States. Calculators were personal,
portabl, and plentiful this past year, with new entries by
Hewlett-Packard and Texas Instruments leading the pack. And jewelers,
accustomed to the familiar tick of mechanical timepieces, had to adjust
to the silence of the digital watch-which, as prices tumble, is showing
up in chain store windows as well as posh display cases. Here, the
technology tug-of-war revolves around readouts: light-emitting diodes
(LEDs) vs. liquid crystal displays (LCDs).
Nearly every phase of garment manufacturing involves skilled labor, and the procedures for production and quality control are largely based on a nonnumeric description of quality and an understanding of the materials . The evidence of the lack of automation in the apparel industry is demonstrated by its growth in developing countries with a low cost labor force and its decline in industrialized nations where labor is more expensive.
Those efforts were unable to successfully automate the entire garment manufacturing process, although sometechnological breakthroughs were integrated into current manufacturing techniques. Outside of research by a handful of university faculty, little has been done in the way of automatic garment manufacturing since the 1980s. Most research attempts have centered on fitting an industrial style robot arm, such as a Puma robot, with a custom end effector to hold the fabric to a surface and change the angle of the fabric while the sewing machine feeds the fabric using its typical sewing dog system. One of the earliest attempts was by Frank Paul at Clemson University . His system used machine vision to detect the edge of a piece of fabric, plan a seam path at an offset to that edge and determine the placement of the end effector on the fabric. However, the vision system was not used for real-time feedback. Although the system was relatively successful, the use of vision to detect fabric edges has been identified as lacking robustness due to outgoing filaments, in homogeneous cuts, and wrinkles in the fabric and thus insufficient for automated sewing . In addition, the project dealt only with manipulating a single piece of fabric and ignored the joining of multiple fabrics. Finally, the results showed the need for real-time feedback during the sewing process. jack stitching machine in chennai, perambur, mylapore, madipakkam
industrial sewing machine and industrial robotic manipulator but adding real-time feedback and closed-loop control . He divided the sewing process into four tasks: contour tracking, tension control, robot feed control and sewing. A standard sewing dog was used to feed the fabric, but the feed rate was computer controlled. The manipulator was given the task of matching the feed rate. A separate control loop was used to maintain proper tension in the fabric based on a force sensor in the end effector. The robot also changed the orientation of the fabric to follow a contour edge using machine vision to detect the edge. The vision system provided real-time feedback to determine the robot trajectory. Although the results were still not very robust with respect to fabric type and sewing speed, the work did outline a set of six performance criteria for automated sewing: (1) hold constant seam width (2)maintain proper fabric tension (3) prevent fabric buckling (4) operate and control sewing machine (5) avoid obstacles and singularities and (6) avoid torque limits. The robustness deficiency centered on the first three objectives, which are associated with sewing quality.
No comments:
Post a Comment